Drug drivers ‘believe it’s safe’ - study
Search Driven for for sale
CULPRITS THINK IT’S NOT AS BAD AS BEING DRUNK, WRITES CHRIS GREEN
People who take drugs before getting behind the wheel of a car believe it is a “much more acceptable” thing to do than driving while drunk, according to a British study.
Drug drivers believe their abilities are not seriously impaired by taking substances such as cannabis, cocaine and Ecstasy and that in any case they are unlikely to be stopped by police, the research found.
The scale of drug-driving is difficult to calculate as statistics are not always recorded, but research suggests that levels are similar to drink-driving.
It is estimated that people driving while under the influence of drugs may account for as many as 200 deaths a year in the UK.
The research, commissioned by the Department for Transport, was based on interviews with people who said they had drug-driven in the past year. Their friends, some of whom had been passengers, were also asked for their opinions.
Some believed that smoking cannabis actually calmed them down before getting behind the wheel, making them less likely to have an accident, while others said cocaine made them feel more alert and attentive while driving.
Most agreed that while drink-driving was socially unacceptable, driving while on drugs did not carry the same stigma.
One young man from Brighton, who said he regularly drove after smoking cannabis, told the focus group: “We do it every day. We just roll one for the way back [from work] and share it as we go along.
“We know it is wrong, but you know it isn’t that wrong. It seems normal.”
The law on drug-driving in England and Wales was tightened last month, giving police powers to test for cannabis and cocaine through a saliva swab at the side of the road. Those found guilty face up to six months in jail, a £5000 ($10,500) fine and an automatic year-long driving ban.
Reacting to the findings, British AA president Edmund King said: “It is worrying that drug-drivers don’t think they are as dangerous as drink-drivers. For some this may be because their drug use is a lifestyle choice so they don’t consider the consequences. We need to get the message out there that drug-driving is as dangerous and socially irresponsible as drink- driving.”
He added that in Glasgow, drug-drivers had tried to avoid detection by drinking half a pint of lager before getting in the car, reasoning that if they were stopped by the police they would pass a breath test. The prospect of a drug swab would prevent this from happening, he argued.
Philip Goose of the road safety charity Brake, added: “The research suggests that people see drug-driving as more acceptable than drink-driving, and that the threat of being caught by the police was not enough to put them off.
“The new drug-driving law ought to make them rethink. Anyone tempted to drive on drugs should be in absolutely no doubt of the penalties they face for endangering people’s lives and that it simply isn’t worth the risk.”
The Department for Transport declined to comment on the study, but when the new law came into force last month, Road Safety Minister Robert Goodwill said he was confident it would “save lives”, adding that driving under the influence of drugs “devastates families and ruins lives”.